Students’ preferences with university teaching practices: analysis of testimonials with artificial intelligence
-
Published:2023-05-16
Issue:4
Volume:71
Page:1709-1724
-
ISSN:1042-1629
-
Container-title:Educational technology research and development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Education Tech Research Dev
Author:
Álvarez-Álvarez CarmenORCID, Falcon SamuelORCID
Abstract
AbstractUniversity teaching practices impact student interest, engagement, and academic performance. This paper presents a study that uses artificial intelligence (AI) to examine students’ preferences for university teaching practices. We asked students in various fields open-ended questions about the best teaching practices they had experienced. Due to the large amount of data obtained, we used the AI-based language model Generative Pretrained Transformer-3 (GPT-3) to analyse the responses. With this model, we sorted students’ testimonies into nine theory-based categories regarding teaching practices. After analysing the reliability of the classifications conducted by GPT-3, we found that the agreement between humans was similar to that observed between humans and the AI model, which supported its reliability. Regarding students’ preferences for teaching practices, the results showed that students prefer practices that focus on (1) clarity and (2) interaction and relationships. These results enable the use of AI-based tools that facilitate the analysis of large amounts of information collected through open methods. At the didactic level, students’ preferences and demand for clear teaching practices (in which ideas and activities are stated and shown without ambiguity) that are based on interaction and relationships (between teachers and students and among students themselves) are demonstrable.
Funder
Universidad de Cantabria Universidad de las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference56 articles.
1. Alegre, O. M., & Villar, L. M. (2017). Indicadores y control estadístico para el seguimiento y evaluación de preferencias de aprendizaje de estudiantes universitarios. Revista De Educación a Distancia (RED). https://doi.org/10.6018/red/55/2 2. Álvarez-Álvarez, C., Sánchez-Ruiz, L., Sarabia Cobo, C., & Montoya-del Corte, J. (2022). Validación de un cuestionario para la evaluación de la interacción en la enseñanza universitaria. REDU. Revista De Docencia Universitaria, 20(1), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2022.15918 3. Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., Dipietro, M., Lovett, M. C., Norman, M. K., & Mayer, R. E. (2010). 7 research-based principles for smart teaching (1st ed.). John Wiley. 4. Aridah, A., Atmowardoyo, H., & Salija, K. (2017). Teacher practices and students’ preferences for written corrective feedback and their implications on writing instruction. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(1), 112. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v7n1p112 5. Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Agarwal, S., Herbert-Voss, A., Krueger, G., Henighan, T., Child, R., Ramesh, A., Ziegler, D. M., Wu, J., Winter, C., … Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2020-Decem.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|