Author:
Na Chungsoo,Jeong Soojeong,Clarke-Midura Jody,Shin Youngin
Abstract
AbstractThe Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework has gained widespread recognition as a theoretical model for understanding student learning in online environments. Despite its prevalence, CoI has been critiqued for its limited emphasis on learners’ proactive roles in self-regulating their own learning. To address this, researchers have suggested integrating self-regulated learning (SRL) into the CoI framework. This integration calls for empirical research to explore the relationship between SRL and the three established CoI presences: teaching, social, and cognitive. Using a person-centered approach, this study examines how varying SRL skills among 750 undergraduate students in an online introductory mathematics course are related to the three CoI components. Latent profile analyses identified five distinct SRL profiles: minimal regulators, low regulators with limited social skills, low regulators, moderate regulators, and competent regulators. We found that students in higher SRL profiles demonstrated higher perception of CoI, whereas those in relatively lower SRL profiles showed lower levels of perceived CoI. Our findings underscore the importance of incorporating self-regulation in the CoI framework for a more comprehensive understanding of online learning.
Funder
Seoul National University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference81 articles.
1. Abar, B., & Loken, E. (2010). Self-regulated learning and self-directed study in a pre-college sample. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(1), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.09.002
2. Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011a). Assessing metacognition in an online community of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.01.005
3. Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011b). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01029.x
4. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. In Babson Survey Research Group (pp. 1–4). Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED572777
5. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Online Learning, 5(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875