Abstract
AbstractPhenotypic variability is the ability of the same species to express different phenotypes under different environmental conditions. Several coral species that exist along a broad depth distribution have been shown to differ in skeletal morphology and nutrient acquisition at different depths, which has been attributed to variability in response to differing levels of light availability. This study examined the phenotypic variability of two common depth generalist corals, Montastraea cavernosa and Porites astreoides, along a gradient from 10 to 50 m in the Cayman Islands, by examining changes in skeletal morphology, photophysiology, symbiont cell density, and chlorophyll concentration. Skeletal features of M. cavernosa were found to increase in size from 10 to 30 m, but returned to smaller sizes from 30 to 50 m, while P. astreoides skeletal features continued to increase in size from 10 to 40 m. No differences were observed in either symbiont density or chlorophyll concentration across depths for either species. However, all photophysiological parameters exhibited significant depth-dependent variations in both species, revealing adaptive strategies to different light environments. These results suggest that both species have high variability in response to depth. Patterns of skeletal morphology and photophysiology, however, suggest that M. cavernosa may be more variable in regulating photosynthetic efficiency compared to P. astreoides, which likely facilitates the broader depth distribution of this species.
Funder
National Science Foundation
United States - Israel Binational Science Foundation
University of Haifa
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference80 articles.
1. Anthony KRN, Larcombe P (2000) Coral reefs in turbid waters: sediment-induced stresses in corals and likely mechanisms of adaptation. In: Proceedings of the 9th international coral reef symposium, Bali, pp 239–244
2. Aronson R, Precht W (2001) White-band disease and the changing face of Caribbean coral reefs. Hydrobiologia 460:25–38. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013103928980
3. Bloomberg J, Holstein DM (2021) Mesophotic coral refuges following multiple disturbances. Coral Reefs 40:821–834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-021-02087-w
4. Bongaerts P, Ridgway T, Sampayo EM, Hoegh-Guldberg O (2010) Assessing the ‘deep reef refugia’ hypothesis: focus on caribbean reefs. Coral Reefs 29:309–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-009-0581-x
5. Bongaerts P, Frade PR, Ogier JJ, Hay KB, van Bleijswijk J, Englebert N, Vermeij MJA, Bak RPM, Visser PM, Hoegh-Guldberg O (2013) Sharing the slope: depth partitioning of agariciid corals and associated Symbiodinium across shallow and mesophotic habitats (2–60 m) on a Caribbean reef. BMC Evol Biol 13:205. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-13-205