Abstract
AbstractAgroforestry systems provide important ecosystem functions and services. They have the potential to enrich agricultural monocultures in central Europe with structural elements otherwise absent, which is expected to be accompanied by a surplus of ecosystem functions. Here we used quantitative measures derived from terrestrial laser scanning in single-scan mode to describe the structural complexity, the canopy openness, the foliage height diversity and the understory complexity of four common agroforest systems in central Europe. We accessed silvopasture systems with grazing ponies and cattle as well as fellow deer, short rotation forests with agricultural use between the tree rows, tree orchards with grazing sheep and Christmas tree plantations on which chickens forage. As a reference, we used data for 65 forest sites across Germany, representing different forest types, various dominant tree species, stand ages and management systems. We found that overall stand structural complexity is ranked as follows: forest > silvopasture systems > short rotation forest > tree orchard > Christmas tree plantation. Consequently, if overall structural complexity of an agricultural landscape shall be enriched, there is now strong evidence on how this may be achieved using agroforests. However, if the focus lies on selected structures that serve specific functions, e.g. dense understory to provide animal shelter, specific types of agroforests may be chosen and the ranking in overall structural complexity may be less important.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science,Forestry
Reference50 articles.
1. Anderson KE, Glenn NF, Spaete LP, Shinneman DJ, Pilliod DS, Arkle RS et al (2017) Methodological considerations of terrestrial laser scanning for vegetation monitoring in the sagebrush steppe. Environ Monit and Assess 189(11):578
2. Bates FS, Harris S (2009) Does hedgerow management on organic farms benefit small mammal populations? Agr Ecosyst Environ 129(1–3):124–130
3. Bengtsson J, Ahnström J, Weibull A-C (2005) The effects of organic agriculture on biodiversity and abundance: a meta-analysis. J Appl Ecol 42:261–269
4. Böhm C, Tsonkova P, Albrecht E, Zehlius-Eckert W (2017) Zur Notwendigkeit einer kontrollfähigen Definition für Agroforstschläge. Agrar- und Umweltrecht 1(2017):7–12
5. Bohn Reckziegel R, Larysch E, Sheppard JP, Kahle HP, Morhart C (2021) Modelling and comparing shading effects of 3D tree structures with virtual leaves. Remote Sens 13(3):532
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献