Abstract
AbstractRobot-assisted navigation is a perfect example of a class of applications requiring flexible control approaches. When the human is reliable, the robot should concede space to their initiative. When the human makes inappropriate choices the robot controller should kick-in guiding them towards safer paths. Shared authority control is a way to achieve this behaviour by deciding online how much of the authority should be given to the human and how much should be retained by the robot. An open problem is how to evaluate the appropriateness of the human’s choices. One possible way is to consider the deviation from an ideal path computed by the robot. This choice is certainly safe and efficient, but it emphasises the importance of the robot’s decision and relegates the human to a secondary role. In this paper, we propose a different paradigm: a human’s behaviour is correct if, at every time, it bears a close resemblance to what other humans do in similar situations. This idea is implemented through the combination of machine learning and adaptive control. The map of the environment is decomposed into a grid. In each cell, we classify the possible motions that the human executes. We use a neural network classifier to classify the current motion, and the probability score is used as a hyperparameter in the control to vary the amount of intervention. The experiments collected for the paper show the feasibility of the idea. A qualitative evaluation, done by surveying the users after they have tested the robot, shows that the participants preferred our control method over a state-of-the-art visco-elastic control.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Mechanical Engineering,Engineering (miscellaneous),Computational Mechanics
Reference29 articles.
1. Flemisch FO, Adams CA, Conway SR, Goodrich KH, Palmer MT, Schutte PC (2003) The h-metaphor as a guideline for vehicle automation and interaction. Technical report, RWTH Aachen University
2. Andreetto M, Divan S, Fontanelli D, Palopoli L (2017) Path following with authority sharing between humans and passive robotic walkers equipped with low-cost actuators. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 2(4):2271–2278
3. Magnago V, Andreetto M, Divan S, Fontanelli D, Palopoli L (2018) Ruling the control authority of a service robot based on information precision. In: Proceedings IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pp. 7204–7210. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2018.8460714
4. Bevilacqua P, Frego M, Bertolazzi E, Fontanelli D, Palopoli L, Biral F (2016) Path planning maximising human comfort for assistive robots. In: 2016 IEEE conference on control applications (CCA), pp. 1421–1427. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCA.2016.7588006
5. Arechavaleta G, Laumond JP, Hicheur H, Berthoz A (2008) An optimality principle governing human walking. IEEE Trans Robot 24(1):5–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2008.915449