Abstract
AbstractPurpose Occupational integration is vital for the health of all people, also for people with Limited Work Capacity (LWC). Therefore, participation in regular work is a legal right for people that are restricted in their work capacity due to a disability and/or lack sufficient education. Full and effective integration is dependent on the person-job fit, and adequate vocational support should focus on meeting performance standards, as is common practice in traditional personnel selection and development programmes. Despite the huge amount of valid instruments for personnel selection and development, these tests are not suitable people with LWC. Recently, an instrument was developed for assessment and development purposes specifically for this target group. That study provided evidence for reliability and dimensionality this instrument. In our study, we add criterion-related measures to this instrument to demonstrate that assessment at T1 predict performance at T2, thus validating the instrument. Method We conducted a four-source data study, two sources for independent and two for outcome variables, to test the predictive validity of this instrument in a multi-wave setup. Results This study largely supports the validity of the instrument in predicting work behaviour and task performance of people with LWC. More specific, when measures are tailored to this target group, this group is able to predict their work behaviour and task performance accurately just like the general population. Conclusion We conclude that this instrument contributes to science, vocational support practices, and the personal and professional development of people with LWC, which is required for sustainable work.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Occupational Therapy,Rehabilitation
Reference72 articles.
1. Jahoda M. Work, employment, and unemployment: values, theories, and approaches in social research. Am Psychol. 1981;36(2):184–191.
2. Jahoda M. Employment and unemployment: a social-psychological analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University; 1982.
3. Warr P. Work, unemployment, and mental health. New York: Oxford University Press; 1987.
4. Schuring M, Robroek SJW, Burdorf A. The benefits of paid employment among persons with common mental health problems: evidence for the selection and causation mechanism. Scand J Work Environ Heal. 2017;43(7):540–549.
5. Wanberg CR. A longitudinal study of the effects of unemployment and quality of reemployment. J Vocat Behav. 1995;46(1):40–54.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献