Abstract
AbstractScenario planning has emerged as a widely used planning process for resource management in situations of consequential, irreducible uncertainty. Because it explicitly incorporates uncertainty, scenario planning is regularly employed in climate change adaptation. An early and essential step in developing scenarios is identifying “climate futures”—descriptions of the physical attributes of plausible future climates that could occur at a specific place and time. Divergent climate futures that describe the broadest possible range of plausible conditions support information needs of decision makers, including understanding the spectrum of potential resource responses to climate change, developing strategies robust to that range, avoiding highly consequential surprises, and averting maladaptation. Here, we discuss three approaches for generating climate futures: a Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP)-ensemble, a quadrant-average, and an individual-projection approach. All are designed to capture relevant uncertainty, but they differ in utility for different applications, complexity, and effort required to implement. Using an application from Big Bend National Park as an example of numerous similar efforts to develop climate futures for National Park Service applications over the past decade, we compare these approaches, focusing on their ability to capture among-projection divergence during early-, mid-, and late-twenty-first century periods to align with near-, mid-, and long-term planning efforts. The quadrant-average approach and especially the individual-projection approach captured a broader range of plausible future conditions than the RCP-ensemble approach, particularly in the near term. Therefore, the individual-projection approach supports decision makers seeking to understand the broadest potential characterization of future conditions. We discuss tradeoffs associated with different climate future approaches and highlight suitable applications.
Funder
National Park Service
u.s. geological survey north central climate adaptation science center
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Atmospheric Science,Global and Planetary Change
Reference65 articles.
1. Abatzoglou JT, Brown TJ (2012) A comparison of statistical downscaling methods suited for wildfire applications. Int J Climatol 32:772–780
2. Albano CM, McCarthy MI, Dettinger MD, McAfee SA (2021) Techniques for constructing climate scenarios for stress test applications. Clim Chang 164:33
3. Battaglin W, Hay L, Lawrence DJ, McCabe G, Norton P (2020) Baseline conditions and projected future hydro-climatic change in national parks in the conterminous United States. Water 12:1704
4. Bock AR, McCabe GJ, Markstrom SL, Atkinson RD (2018) Do downscaled general circulation models reliably simulate historical climatic conditions? Earth Interact 22:1–22
5. BOR (2014) Hood River Basin study: climate change analysis technical memorandum. Bureau of Reclamation Pacific Northwest Regional Office, Boise, Idaho https://www.usbr.gov/pn/studies/hoodriver/reports/hrclimate.pdf. Accessed 11 Jun 2021
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献