Author:
Marcos-Garcia P.,Pulido-Velazquez M.,Sanchis-Ibor C.,García-Mollá M.,Ortega-Reig M.,Garcia-Prats A.,Girard C.
Abstract
Abstract
Climate change is challenging the conventional approaches for water systems planning. Two main approaches are commonly implemented in the design of climate change adaptation plans: impact-oriented top-down approaches and vulnerability-oriented bottom-up approaches. In order to overcome the shortcomings of both approaches and take advantage of their strengths, we propose an integrative methodology to define adaptation strategies at basin scale, identifying and combining potential changes in water demand and water supply infrastructure along with climate variability and change. The impact of climate change on future local water availability is assessed applying a top-down approach. Local knowledge is used through a participatory bottom-up approach to foresee future scenarios of evolution of the agricultural sector and agricultural water demand, and to identify locally relevant adaptation strategies. A hydroeconomic model integrates the information from both approaches to identify a socially acceptable and cost-effective program of measures for each climate scenario. This method was applied to the Jucar basin, a highly regulated basin with a tight equilibrium between water resources and demands. The results show an important variability of climate change impacts across the basin, with main inflow reductions in the headwaters. The stakeholders prioritized the adaptation options of change to drip irrigation, use of non-conventional resources, and changes in water governance. The results obtained from the hydroeconomic model show that the portfolio of selected adaptation measures could significantly reduce the system’s average annual deficit and cost.
Funder
Ministerio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital, Gobierno de España
Universidad Politècnica de València
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Atmospheric Science,Global and Planetary Change
Reference84 articles.
1. Aburas MM, Ahamad MSS, Omar NQ (2019) Spatio-temporal simulation and prediction of land-use change using conventional and machine learning models: a review. Environ Monit Assess 191:205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7330-6
2. ACUAMED (2006). Informe de viabilidad de la actuación 3.2.c “Ordenación y terminación de la reutilización de aguas residuales de la planta de Pinedo (Valencia)” (según lo contemplado en la Ley 11/2005, de 22 de junio, por la que se modifica la Ley 10/2001, de 5 de julio, del Plan Hidrológico Nacional)
3. Apperl B, Pulido-Velázquez M, Andreu J, Karjalainen TP (2015) Contribution of the multi-attribute value theory to conflict resolution in groundwater management – application to the Mancha Oriental groundwater system, Spain. Hydrological Earth System Sciences 19:1325–1337. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1325-2015
4. Berkhout F, Hertin J, Jordan A (2002) Socio-economic futures in climate change impact assessment: using scenarios as ‘learning machines.’ Glob Environ Chang 12:83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(02)00006-7
5. Bhave AG, Mishra A, Raghuwanshi NS (2014) A combined bottom-up and top-down approach for assessment of climate change adaptation options. J Hydrol 518:150–161
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献