Abstract
Abstract
Fossil fuel producers develop too many reserves for combustion due to subsidies for upfront development costs. The conventional wisdom is that downward-sloping tax profiles avoid green paradox outcomes by reducing present extraction. This paper shows that accounting for subsidized reserves development can induce green paradox outcomes for downward-sloping income tax profiles. A theoretical model linking reserves development and extraction with climate change damages is developed to explore conditions for the weak and strong green paradox outcomes of higher present extraction and cumulative damages. We find that the weak green paradox arises under higher and flatter income tax profiles. The strong green paradox is an ambiguous outcome without subsidized reserves development. Quantitative examples demonstrate the effect of downward-sloping tax profiles on crude oil extraction and how the strong green paradox arises when delayed emissions are less relevant for damages.
Funder
Australian National University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Atmospheric Science,Global and Planetary Change
Reference38 articles.
1. Asheim G (2013) A distributional argument for supply-side climate policies. Environ Res Econ 56:239–254
2. Asheim G, Faehn T, Nyborg K, Greaker M, Hagem C, Harstad B, Hoel M, Lund D, Rosendahl K (2019) The case for a supply-side climate treaty. Science 365:325–327
3. Bast E, Doukas A, Pickard S, van der Burg L, Whitley S (2015) Empty promises: G20 subsidies to oil, gas and coal production. Overseas Development Institute (ODI), London, and Oil Change International (OCI), Washington, D.C.
4. Carbon Tracker (2017) 2 degrees of separation - transition risk for oil and gas to a low carbon world. www.carbontracker.org
5. Cruz JL, Rossi-Hansberg E (2021) The economic geography of global warming. National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper, no. 28466 (February): 1–52