Abstract
AbstractThe climate crisis is an unprecedented existential threat that causes disturbing emotions, such as anxiety. Recently, Clayton and Karazsia measured climate anxiety as “a more clinically significant ‘anxious’ response to climate change” (2020, p. 9). To gain a more nuanced understanding of the phenomenon from an empirical psychological perspective, we translated the core of the Climate Anxiety Scale into German and assessed potential correlates in a large German-speaking quota sample (N = 1011, stratified by age and gender). Overall, people reported low levels of climate anxiety. Climate anxiety correlated positively with general anxiety and depressiveness, avoidance of climate change in everyday life, frustration of basic psychological needs, pro-environmental behavioral intentions, and policy support. It correlated negatively with different forms of climate denial and was unrelated to ideological beliefs. We were not able to replicate the two dimensions found in the original scale. Moreover, we argue that items appear to measure a general climate-related emotional impairment, rather than distinctly and comprehensively capturing climate anxiety. Thus, we encourage researchers to rework the scale and include an emotional factor in future research efforts.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Atmospheric Science,Global and Planetary Change
Reference98 articles.
1. Albrecht G (2012) Psychoterratic conditions in a scientific and technological world. In: Kahn PH, Hasbach PH (eds) Ecopsychology: Science, Totems, and the Technological Species. MIT Press, pp 241–264
2. Altemeyer B (1981) Right-wing authoritarianism. University of Manitoba Press
3. Wullenkord MC (under review). From denial of facts to rationalization and avoidance: ideology, needs, and gender predict the spectrum of climate denial and self-protection. Personality and Individual Differences
4. Barlow DH (2002) Anxiety and its disorders: the nature and treatment of anxiety and panic (2nd ed.). Guilford Press
5. Benita M, Kehat R, Zaba R, Blumenkranz Y, Kessler G, Bar-Sella A, Tamir M (2019) Choosing to regulate emotions: pursuing emotion goals in autonomy-supportive and controlling contexts. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 45(12):1666–1680. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219838557
Cited by
122 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献