Abstract
AbstractClimate models are what governments, experts and societies base their decisions on future climate action on. To show how different models were used to explain climatic changes and to project future climates before the emergence of a global consensus on the validity of general circulation models, this article focuses on the attempt of Soviet climatologists and their government to push for their climate model to be acknowledged by the international climate science community. It argues that Soviet climate sciences as well as their interpretations of the climate of the twenty-first century were products of the Cold War, and that the systematic lack of access to high-speed computers forced Soviet climatologists to use simpler climate reconstructions as analogues, with far-reaching consequences for climate sciences in post-Soviet Russia. By juxtaposing the history of Soviet climate modelling with the early history of the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change, which rejected the Soviet model, the article sheds light on the relationship of science and politics. The findings are based on archival and print material as well as on interviews.
Funder
EHESS
Arts and Humanities Research Council
University of Fribourg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Atmospheric Science,Global and Planetary Change
Reference72 articles.
1. Abdusamatov K (2019) Solnce diktuet klimat zemli [The Sun dictates the earth's climate] Logos, Saint Petersburg
2. Agrawala S (1998) Context and early origins of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Clim Change 39:605–620
3. Aleksandrov V et al (1983) Global’naia model’ sistemy okean-atmosfera i issledovanie ee chuvstvitel’nosti k izmeneniiu kontsentratsii CO2 [A global model of the ocean-atmosphere system and the study of its sensitivity to changes in CO2 concentration] Izvestiia AN SSSR. Fizika Atmosfery i Okeana 19(5):451–458
4. Bedritskii A et al (2017) Roshydromet supercomputer technologies for numerical weather prediction. Russ Meteorol Hydrol 42(7):425–434
5. Bogdanov N (2019) K voprosu o tselesoobraznosti ofitsial’nogo priznanija termina “antropotsen” (na primere regionov Evrazii) [On the question of expediency of the official acceptance of the term „Anthropocene“ (On the example of regions in Eurasia), Izvestiia vysshikh utshebnikh zavedenii. Geologiia i Razvedka 2(2019):67–73
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献