Effective signal reconstruction from multiple ranked lists via convex optimization

Author:

Schimek Michael G.ORCID,Vitale Luca,Pfeifer Bastian,La Rocca Michele

Abstract

AbstractThe ranking of objects is widely used to rate their relative quality or relevance across multiple assessments. Beyond classical rank aggregation, it is of interest to estimate the usually unobservable latent signals that inform a consensus ranking. Under the only assumption of independent assessments, which can be incomplete, we introduce indirect inference via convex optimization in combination with computationally efficient Poisson Bootstrap. Two different objective functions are suggested, one linear and the other quadratic. The mathematical formulation of the signal estimation problem is based on pairwise comparisons of all objects with respect to their rank positions. Sets of constraints represent the order relations. The transitivity property of rank scales allows us to reduce substantially the number of constraints associated with the full set of object comparisons. The key idea is to globally reduce the errors induced by the rankers until optimal latent signals can be obtained. Its main advantage is low computational costs, even when handling $$n < < p$$ n < < p data problems. Exploratory tools can be developed based on the bootstrap signal estimates and standard errors. Simulation evidence, a comparison with the state-of-the-art rank centrality method, and two applications, one in higher education evaluation and the other in molecular cancer research, are presented.

Funder

Medical University of Graz

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Computer Science Applications,Information Systems

Reference37 articles.

1. Alvo M, Yu PLH (2014) Statistical methods for ranking data. Springer, New York

2. Babu GJ, Pathak PK, Rao CR (1999) Second-order correctness of the Poisson bootstrap. Ann Stat 27(5):1666–1683

3. Bradley RA, Terry ME (1955) Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: I. The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika 39, 3/4, 324–345

4. de Borda JC. (1781) Mémoire sur les Élections au Scrutiny. Histoire de l’Acaémie Royal des Sciences, Paris

5. Chamandy N, Muralidharan O, Najmi A, Naidu S (2012) Estimating Uncertainty for Massive Data Streams. Technical Report, Google

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3