Benchmarking and survey of explanation methods for black box models

Author:

Bodria FrancescoORCID,Giannotti Fosca,Guidotti Riccardo,Naretto Francesca,Pedreschi Dino,Rinzivillo Salvatore

Abstract

AbstractThe rise of sophisticated black-box machine learning models in Artificial Intelligence systems has prompted the need for explanation methods that reveal how these models work in an understandable way to users and decision makers. Unsurprisingly, the state-of-the-art exhibits currently a plethora of explainers providing many different types of explanations. With the aim of providing a compass for researchers and practitioners, this paper proposes a categorization of explanation methods from the perspective of the type of explanation they return, also considering the different input data formats. The paper accounts for the most representative explainers to date, also discussing similarities and discrepancies of returned explanations through their visual appearance. A companion website to the paper is provided as a continuous update to new explainers as they appear. Moreover, a subset of the most robust and widely adopted explainers, are benchmarked with respect to a repertoire of quantitative metrics.

Funder

H2020 European Research Council

H2020 LEIT Information and Communication Technologies

H2020 Excellent Science

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Computer Science Applications,Information Systems

Reference177 articles.

1. Abujabal A, Roy RS, Yahya M, et al (2017) QUINT: interpretable question answering over knowledge bases. In: Proceedings of the 2017 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, EMNLP 2017, Copenhagen, Denmark—system demonstrations

2. Adadi A, Berrada M (2018) Peeking inside the black-box: a survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). IEEE Access

3. Adebayo J, Gilmer J, Muelly M, et al (2018) Sanity checks for saliency maps. In: Advances in neural information processing systems 31: annual conference on neural information processing systems 2018, NeurIPS 2018, Montréal, Canada

4. Adebayo J, Muelly M, Liccardi I, et al (2020) Debugging tests for model explanations. In: Advances in neural information processing systems 33: annual conference on neural information processing systems 2020, NeurIPS 2020, virtual

5. Agarwal R, Melnick L, Frosst N, et al (2021) Neural additive models: Interpretable machine learning with neural nets. In: Advances in neural information processing systems 34: annual conference on neural information processing systems 2021, NeurIPS 2021, virtual

Cited by 32 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3