Abstract
AbstractInterdisciplinarity is strongly promoted in science policy across the world. It is seen as a necessary condition for providing practical solutions to many pressing complex problems for which no single disciplinary approach is adequate alone. In this article we model multi- and interdisciplinary research as an instance of collective problem solving. Our goal is to provide a basic representation of this type of problem solving and chart the epistemic benefits and costs of researchers engaging in different forms of cognitive coordination. Our findings suggest that typical forms of interdisciplinary collaboration are unlikely to find optimal solutions to complex problems within short time frames and can lead to methodological conservatism. This provides some grounds for both reflecting on current science policy and envisioning more effective scientific practices with respect to interdisciplinary problem solving.
Funder
Academy of Finland
University of Helsinki including Helsinki University Central Hospital
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference40 articles.
1. Adams, J., Jackson, L. & Marshall, S. (2007). Bibliometric analysis of interdisciplinary research. Report to the Higher Education Funding Council for England .
2. Baldwin, C.Y. & Clark, K.B. (2000). Design rules: The power of modularity (Vol. 1). MIT press.
3. Bechtel, W., & Richardson, R. (2010). Discovering complexity: Decomposition and localization as strategies in scientific research. MIT Press.
4. Bernstein, J.H. (2015). Transdisciplinarity: A review of its origins, development, and current issues. Journal of Research Practice 11(1) .
5. Bruce, A., Lyall, C., Tait, J., & Williams, R. (2004). Interdisciplinary integration in Europe: The case of the Fifth Framework programme. Futures, 36(4), 457–470.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献