Abstract
AbstractAccording to Paul (Transformative experience, 1st edn, Oxford University Press, 2014), transformative experiences pose a challenge to decision theory since their value cannot be anticipated. Building on Pettigrew’s (in: Lambert, Schwenkler (eds) Becoming someone new: essays on transformative experience, choice, and change, Oxford University Press, pp 100–121, 2020) redescription, this paper presents a new approach to how and when transformative decisions can nevertheless be made rationally. Thanks to fundamental higher-order facts that apply to any kind of experience, an agent always at least knows the general shape of the utility space. This in combination with the knowledge about the non-transformative alternative in the choice set can enable rational decision-making despite the presence of a transformative experience. For example, this paper’s approach provides novel arguments for why gender transition (cf. McKinnon in Res Philosophica 92(2):419–440, 2015) or staying childfree (cf. Barnes in Philos Phenomenol Res 91(3):775–786, 2015) can be rational.
Funder
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Universität Zürich
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference41 articles.
1. Barnes, E. (2015). What you can expect when you don’t want to be expecting. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 91(3), 775–786.
2. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370.
3. Baumeister, R. F., Heartherton, T. F., & Tice, D. M. (1994). Losing control: How and why people fail at self-regulation. Academic Press.
4. Buchak, L. (2013). Risk and rationality. Oxford University Press.
5. Campbell, J. (2015). LA Paul’s transformative experience. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 91(3), 787–793.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献