Abstract
AbstractWe present a new metaphysical framework for physics that is conceptually clear, ontologically parsimonious, and empirically adequate. This framework relies on the notion of self-subsisting structure, that is, a set of fundamental physical elements whose individuation and behavior are described in purely relational terms, without any need for a background spacetime. Although the specification of the fundamental elements of the ontology depends on the particular physical domain considered—and is thus susceptible to scientific progress—the empirically successful structural features of the framework are preserved through theory change. The kinematics and dynamics of these self-subsisting structures are technically implemented using the theoretical framework of Pure Shape Dynamics, which provides a completely relational physical description of a system in terms of the intrinsic geometry of a suitably defined space called shape space.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference57 articles.
1. Anderson, E. (2013). The problem of time and quantum cosmology in the relational particle mechanics arena. arXiv:1111.1472v3
2. Anderson, E. (2016). Configuration spaces in fundamental physics. arxiv:1503.01507.
3. Anderson, E., Barbour, J., Foster, B., & Murchadha, N. Ó. (2003). Scale-invariant gravity: Geometrodynamics. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 20, 1571.
4. Baker, D. (2020). Some consequences of physics for the comparative metaphysics of quantity. In K. Bennett & D. Zimmerman (Eds.), Oxford studies in metaphysics (Vol. 12, pp. 75–112). Oxford University Press.
5. Barbour, J. (1994a). The timelessness of quantum gravity: I. The evidence from the classical theory. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 11, 2853–2873.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Herglotz action for homogeneous cosmologies;Classical and Quantum Gravity;2023-05-03