Explaining how to perceive the new: causal-informational teleosemantics and productive response functions-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Explaining how to perceive the new: causal-informational teleosemantics and productive response functions

Published:2019-10-01 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:0039-7857
Container-title:Synthese
language:en
Short-container-title:Synthese

Author:

Hundertmark Fabian^ORCID

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Social Sciences,Philosophy

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11229-019-02406-3.pdf

Reference39 articles.

1. Agar, N. (1993). What do frogs really believe? Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 71(1), 1–12.

2. Aizawa, K. (2003). The systematicity arguments. Dordrecht: Springer.

3. Aydede, M. (2010). The language of thought hypothesis. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2010). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/language-thought/ .

4. Cao, R. (2012). A teleosemantic approach to information in the brain. Biology and Philosophy, 27(1), 49–71.

5. Crook, A. C., Baddeley, R., & Osorio, D. (2002). Identifying the structure in cuttlefish visual signals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 357(1427), 1617–1624.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Biological functions and dysfunctions: a selected dispositions approach;Biology & Philosophy;2024-03-16

2. Mental Content;2023-08-12

3. The Dilemma of Ahistorical Teleosemantics;Philosophy of Science;2023-08-09

4. Response to Neander's Critics;Philosophy and Phenomenological Research;2022-09