Author:
Barrett Thomas William,Manchak J. B.,Weatherall James Owen
Abstract
AbstractWilhelm (Forthcom Synth 199:6357–6369, 2021) has recently defended a criterion for comparing structure of mathematical objects, which he calls Subgroup. He argues that Subgroup is better than SYM$$^*$$∗, another widely adopted criterion. We argue that this is mistaken; Subgroup is strictly worse than SYM$$^*$$∗. We then formulate a new criterion that improves on both SYM$$^*$$∗and Subgroup, answering Wilhelm’s criticisms of SYM$$^*$$∗along the way. We conclude by arguing that no criterion that looks only to the automorphisms of mathematical objects to compare their structure can be fully satisfactory.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference18 articles.
1. Baez, J., Bartels, T., Dolan, J., & Corfield, D. (2006). Property, structure and stuff. Available at http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/qg-spring2004/discussion.html.
2. Barrett, T. W. (2015). On the structure of classical mechanics. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 66(4), 801–828.
3. Barrett, T. W. (2015). Spacetime structure. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B, 51, 37–43.
4. Barrett, T. W. (2018). What do symmetries tell us about structure? Philosophy of Science, 85, 617–639.
5. Barrett, T.W. (2021). How to count structure. Forthcoming in Noûs.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献