On automorphism criteria for comparing amounts of mathematical structure

Author:

Barrett Thomas William,Manchak J. B.,Weatherall James Owen

Abstract

AbstractWilhelm (Forthcom Synth 199:6357–6369, 2021) has recently defended a criterion for comparing structure of mathematical objects, which he calls Subgroup. He argues that Subgroup is better than SYM$$^*$$, another widely adopted criterion. We argue that this is mistaken; Subgroup is strictly worse than SYM$$^*$$. We then formulate a new criterion that improves on both SYM$$^*$$and Subgroup, answering Wilhelm’s criticisms of SYM$$^*$$along the way. We conclude by arguing that no criterion that looks only to the automorphisms of mathematical objects to compare their structure can be fully satisfactory.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Social Sciences,Philosophy

Reference18 articles.

1. Baez, J., Bartels, T., Dolan, J., & Corfield, D. (2006). Property, structure and stuff. Available at http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/qg-spring2004/discussion.html.

2. Barrett, T. W. (2015). On the structure of classical mechanics. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 66(4), 801–828.

3. Barrett, T. W. (2015). Spacetime structure. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B, 51, 37–43.

4. Barrett, T. W. (2018). What do symmetries tell us about structure? Philosophy of Science, 85, 617–639.

5. Barrett, T.W. (2021). How to count structure. Forthcoming in Noûs.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3