Abstract
AbstractQualitative researchers sometimes talk about objectivity in relation to qualitative data sets. In this paper, I defend a reconstructed notion of objective qualitative data sets that may serve as a useful and reachable guiding ideal in qualitative data generation. In the first part of the paper, I develop the ideal. According to it, a qualitative data set is objective to the extent that it, in conjunction with true assumptions, possesses a combination of good-making features (epistemic values, epistemic virtues) in virtue of which the data set is suited to serve as evidence base for a satisfying answer to the research question under study. In the second part of the paper, I examine and reject two possible lines of objection to this ideal: One is that it picks out the wrong good-making features. The other is that the very focus on good-making features is misguided: the objectivity of a qualitative data set should instead be seen as a matter of how it was generated or evaluated.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference38 articles.
1. Anderson, E. (1995). Knowledge, human interests, and objectivity in feminist epistemology. Philosophical Topics, 23(2), 27–58.
2. Anderson, E. (2015). Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science. In E. N. Zalta (ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-epistemology/#object. Accessed 1 Nov 2016.
3. Bailey, J. (2008). First steps in qualitative data analysis: Transcribing. Family Practice, 25, 127–131.
4. Bengtsson, Tea T. (2014). What are data? Ethnographic experiences with young offenders. Qualitative Research, 14(6), 729–744.
5. Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献