Author:
Leuschner Anna,Fernandez Pinto Manuela
Abstract
AbstractThe shooting bias hypothesis aims to explain the disproportionate number of minorities killed by police. We present the evidence mounting in support of the existence of shooting bias and then focus on two dissenting studies. We examine these studies in light of Biddle and Leuschner’s (2015) “inductive risk account of epistemically detrimental dissent” and conclude that, although they meet this account only partially, the studies are in fact epistemically and socially detrimental as they contribute to racism in society and to a social atmosphere that is hostile to science as scholars working on issues of racism come under attack. We emphasize this final point via recourse to Kitcher’s “Millian argument against the freedom of research.”
Funder
Bergische Universität Wuppertal
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference64 articles.
1. AAUP (2018). 50 Cases of Targeted Harassment. Online https://www.aaup.org/sites/default/files/files/Mariah/academic-freedom-trump.pdf (Accessed 3
2. Barned-Smith, S. J. (2016). McClelland Presided over ‘Culture change’ at HPD. Online: https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/McClelland-presided-over-culture-change-at-HPD-6845901.php. (Accessed 2 July 2021)
3. Biddle, J., Kidd, I., & Leuschner, A. (2017). Epistemic Corruption and Manufactured Doubt: The Case of Climate Science. Public Affairs Quarterly, 31(3), 165–187
4. Biddle, J., & Leuschner, A. (2015). Climate Skepticism and the Manufacture of Doubt: Can Dissent in Science Be Epistemically Detrimental? European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 5(3), 261–278
5. Bolton, K. Jr., & Feagin, J. R. (2004). Black in Blue: African-American Police Officers and Racism. Routledge
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献