Diaphonic pluralism: from truth pluralism to disagreement pluralism-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Diaphonic pluralism: from truth pluralism to disagreement pluralism

Published:2022-09-18 Issue:5 Volume:200 Page:
ISSN:1573-0964
Container-title:Synthese
language:en
Short-container-title:Synthese

Author:

Moruzzi Sebastiano^ORCID

Abstract

AbstractIn this paper, I offer a pluralistic framework for disagreement and I develop a strategy to account for the varieties of disagreement on the basis of the varieties of the truth across different domains of discourse. Truth-pluralism is thus sufficient for delivering pluralism about disagreement—that is, diaphonic pluralism.

Funder

Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Social Sciences,Philosophy

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11229-022-03852-2.pdf

Reference63 articles.

1. Cappelen, H., & Hawthorne, J. (2009). Relativism and monadic truth. Oxford University Press.

2. Coliva, A., & Moruzzi, S. (2014). Faultless disagreement and the equal validity paradox. In S. Caputo, F. Bacchini, & M. Dell’Utri (Eds.), New frontiers in truth. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

3. Coliva, A., & Moruzzi, S. (2019). Dialetheism in action: a new strategy for solving the equal validity paradox? In A. Rieger & G. Young (Eds.), Dialetheism and its applications. Springer.

4. Cook, R. (2018). Pluralism about pluralisms. In J. Wyatt, N. Kellen, & N. Pedersen (Eds.), Pluralisms in truth and Logic. Palgrave.

5. Cotnoir, A. J., & Edwards, D. (2015). From truth pluralism to ontological pluralism and back. Journal of Philosophy, 112(3), 113–140.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Post-Enquiry and Disagreement. A Socio-Epistemological Model of the Normative Significance of Disagreement Between Scientists and Denialists;Social Epistemology;2022-10-25