Abstract
AbstractFormal methods for representing the characteristic features of organic development and growth make it possible to map the large-scale teleological structure of organic activity. This provides a basis for semantically evaluating, or providing a theory of meaning for, talk of organic activity as purposive. For the processes of organic generation and growth are subjunctively robust under a variety of influences characteristic for the kind or species in question, and these subjunctive conditions can be displayed in a two-dimensional array. After motivating and introducing this array, I use its two dimensions to partially account for features of the purposiveness characterizing two sets of exemplars of the plant and animal kingdoms: ferns and cacti, and cheetah and gazelle. The result is a formal framework for interpreting talk of organic activity as purposive, able to be adapted to a range of research traditions in the philosophy of language and the philosophy of biology.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference98 articles.
1. Allen, C., Neal, J. (2020). Teleological notions in biology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2020 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/teleology-biology.
2. Ayala, F. J. (1998). Teleological explanations versus teleology. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 20(1), 41–50.
3. Belnap, N., Perloff, M., & Ming, Xu. (2001). Facing the future: Agents and choices in our indeterminist world. Oxford University Press.
4. Ben-Menahem, Y. (2018). Causation in science. Princeton University Press.
5. Bich, L., Mossio, M., Ruiz-Mirazo, K., & Moreno, A. (2016). Biological regulation: Controlling the system from within. Biology and Philosophy, 31, 237–265
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献