Abstract
AbstractPolicy-makers often rely on scientists to inform their decisions. When advising policy-makers, what should scientists say? One view says that scientists ought to say what they have a high credence in. Another view says that scientists ought to say what they expect to lead to good policy outcomes. We explore a third view: scientists ought to say what they expect to make the policy-makers’ credences accurate.
Funder
studienstiftung des deutschen volkes
claussen-simon-stiftung
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference57 articles.
1. Akin, H., & Landrum, A. (2017). A recap: Heuristics, biases, values, and other challenges to communicating science. In K. H. Jamieson, D. Kahan, & D. A Scheufele (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the science of science communication (pp. 455–460). Oxford University Press.
2. Barnes, D., & Bero, L. (1996). Industry-funded research and conflict of interest: an analysis of research sponsored by the tobacco industry through the center for indoor air research. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 21(3), 515–542.
3. Betz, G. (2013). In defence of the value free ideal. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 3, 207–220.
4. Bolsen, T., Druckman, J. N., & Cook, F. L. (2014). How frames can undermine support for scientific adaptations: Politicization and the status-quo bias. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(1), 1–26.
5. Boulicault, M., & Schroeder, S. A. (2021). Public trust in science: Exploring the idiosyncrasy-free ideal. In Social Trust (pp. 102–121). Routledge.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献