Abstract
AbstractThe paper proposes a dialectical approach to our understanding of the relation between teleology and mechanism. This approach is dialectical both in form and content. Inform, it proposes a contemporary interpretation of Hegel’s metaphysical account of teleology. This account is grounded in a dialectical methodology, which consists in scrutinizing the inherent limitations of a theoretical position that lead it to suppress itself and evolve into a better one. I apply the same methodology to the function debate. For Hegel, teleology can be understood in three main variants, which can be fruitfully mapped onto the three main positions in the function debate, the key conceptual distinction being whether teleological principles are understood as extrinsic or intrinsic. When it comes to autonomous systems, i.e. systems that embody the regime ofGeist, extrinsic functionality must be grounded in intrinsic functionality. My approach is dialectical also incontent, insofar as it concludes that intrinsic functional ascriptions rely on the relation of co-determination between the parts and the whole of a system, as well as between the system and its environment.
Funder
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Universidad del País Vasco
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference107 articles.
1. Aaby, B. H., & Desmond, H. (2021). Niche construction and teleology: Organisms as agents and contributors in ecology, development and evolution. Biology & Philosophy, 36(5), 1–20.
2. Austin, C. J., & Marmodoro, A. (2018). Structural powers and the homeodynamic unity of organisms. In W. M. R. Simpson, R. C. Koons, & N. J. Teh (Eds.), Neo-Aristotelian perspectives on contemporary science. London: Routledge.
3. Bechtel, W. (2007). Biological mechanisms: organized to maintain autonomy. In F. Booderd, F. J. Bruggeman, J.-H.S. Hofmeyr, & H. V. Westerhoff (Eds.), Systems biology: Philosophical foundations (pp. 269–302). Elsevier.
4. Bechtel, W. (2008). Mental mechanisms: Philosophical perspectives on cognitive neuroscience. Routledge.
5. Bechtel, W., & Abrahamsen, A. (2005). Explanation: A mechanist alternative. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36(2), 421–441.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献