Abstract
AbstractThe illicit diffusion of intimate photographs or videos intended for private use is a troubling phenomenon known as the diffusion of Non-Consensual Intimate Images (NCII). Recently, it has been feared that the spread of deepfake technology, which allows users to fabricate fake intimate images or videos that are indistinguishable from genuine ones, may dramatically extend the scope of NCII. In the present essay, we counter this pessimistic view, arguing for qualified optimism instead. We hypothesize that the growing diffusion of deepfakes will end up disrupting the status that makes our visual experience of photographic images and videos epistemically and affectively special; and that once divested of this status, NCII will lose much of their allure in the eye of the perpetrators, probably resulting in diminished diffusion. We conclude by offering some caveats and drawing some implications to better understand, and ultimately better counter, this phenomenon.
Funder
HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council
Università degli Studi Roma Tre
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference54 articles.
1. Anscomb, C. (2022). Look a little (Chuck) closer: aesthetic attention and the contact phenomenon. British Journal of Aesthetics, 62(3), 475–492.
2. Byron, P., McKee, A., Watson, A., Litsou, K., & Ingham, R. (2021). Reading for realness: Porn literacies, digital media, and young people. Sexuality & Culture, 25(3), 786–805.
3. Caletti, G. M. (2021). Can affirmative consent Save” revenge Porn” laws? Lessons from the italian criminalization of non-consensual pornography. Va JL & Tech, 25, 112.
4. Calvert, C., & Brown, J. (2000). Video Voyeurism, privacy, and the internet: Exposing peeping toms in cyberspce. Cardozo Arts & Ent. LJ, 18, 469.
5. Cavedon-Taylor, D. (2013). Photographically based knowledge. Episteme, 10(3), 283–297.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献