Abstract
AbstractDavid Hume and other philosophers doubt that causality can be perceived directly. Instead, observers become aware of it through inference based on the perception of the two events constituting cause and effect of the causal relation. However, Hume and the other philosophers primarily consider causal relations in which one object triggers a motion or change in another. In this paper, I will argue against Hume’s assumption by distinguishing a kind of causal relations in which an agent is controlling the motion or change of an object. I will call this kind of causal relations ‘causation-as-control’. In instances of causation-as-control, the observer does not become aware of the causality through inference based on the perception of two events (cause and effect). Rather, she perceives the two events directly and without further inference as cause and effect of a causal relation, and, therefore, the causality at work.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference26 articles.
1. Anscombe, G. E. M. (1993). Causality and determination. In E. Sosa & M. Tooley (Eds.), Causation (pp. 88–104). University Press.
2. Anscombe, G. E. M. (2000). Intention. Harvard University Press.
3. Beasley, N. A. (1968). The extent of individual differences in the perception of causality. Can Journal of Psychology, 22, 399–407.
4. Beebee, H. (2006). Hume on causation. Routledge.
5. Beebee, H. (2009). Causation and observation. In H. Beebee, C. Hitchcock, & P. Menzies (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Causation (pp. 416–439). University Press.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献