Abstract
AbstractIn this article, I try to shed new light on Frege’s envisaged definitional introduction of real and complex numbers inDie Grundlagen der Arithmetik(1884) and the status of cross-sortal identity claims with side glances atGrundgesetze der Arithmetik(vol. I 1893, vol. II 1903). As far as I can see, this topic has not yet been discussed in the context ofGrundlagen. I show why Frege’s strategy in the case of the projected definitions of real and complex numbers inGrundlagenis modelled on his definitional introduction of cardinal numbers in two steps, tentatively via a contextual definition and finally and definitively via an explicit definition. I argue that the strategy leaves a few important questions open, in particular one relating to the status of the envisioned abstraction principles for the real and complex numbers and another concerning the proper handling of cross-sortal identity claims.
Funder
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference39 articles.
1. Avron, A., & Grabmayr, B. (2022). Breaking the tie: Benacerraf’s identification argument revisited. Philosophia Mathematica. https://doi.org/10.1093/philmat/nkac022
2. Benacerraf, P. (1965). What numbers could not be. The Philosophical Review, 74, 47–73.
3. Boccuni F., & Panza, M. (2022). Frege’s theory of real numbers: A consistent rendering. The Review of Symbolic Logic, 15, 624–667.
4. Boolos, G. (1987). The consistency of Frege’s foundations of arithmetic. In J. J. Thomson (Ed.), On being and saying. Essays for Richard Cartwright (pp. 3–20). The MIT Press.
5. Cook, R. T., & Ebert, P. A. (2005). Identity and abstraction. Dialectica, 59, 121–139.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献