Abstract
AbstractChimpanzees and humans are close evolutionary relatives who behave in many of the same ways based on a similar type of agentive organization. To what degree do they experience the world in similar ways as well? Using contemporary research in evolutionarily biology and animal cognition, I explicitly compare the kinds of experience the two species of capable of having. I conclude that chimpanzees’ experience of the world, their experiential niche as I call it, is: (i) intentional in basically the same way as humans’; (ii) rational in the sense that it is self-critical and operates with logically structured causal and intentional inferences; but (iii) not normative at all in that it does not operate with “objective” evaluative standards. Scientific data do not answer philosophical questions, but they provide rich raw material for scientists and philosophers alike to reflect on and clarify fundamental psychological concepts.
Funder
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference67 articles.
1. Andrews, K., & Beck, J. (2018). The Routledge handbook a philosophy of animal minds. New York: Routledge
2. Baker, C. L., Saxe, R., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2009). Action understanding as inverse planning. Cognition, 113(3), 329–349
3. Bermudez, J. (2003). Thinking without words. Oxford University Press
4. Blaser, R., & Ginchansky, R. (2012). Route selection by rats and humans in a navigational traveling salesman problem. Animal Cognition, 15, 239–250
5. Bohn, M., Allritz, M., Call, J., & Völter, C. J. (2017). Information seeking about tool properties in great apes. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1–6
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献