Interactive agential dynamics
Abstract
AbstractThe study of active matter systems demonstrates how interactions might co-constitute agential dynamics. Active matter systems are comprised of self-propelled independent entities which, en masse, take part in complex and interesting collective group behaviors at a far-from-equilibrium state (Menon, 2010; Takatori & Brady, 2015). These systems are modelled using very simple rules (Vicsek at al. 1995), which reveal the interactive nature of the collective behaviors seen from humble to highly complex entities. Here I show how the study of active matter systems supports two related proposals regarding interaction and agency. First, I argue that the study of interactive dynamics in these systems evidences the utility of treating interaction as an ontological category (Longino, 2021) and challenges methodological individualism as the received explanatory primitive in the study of agency. Second, the methods used to research active matter systems demonstrate how a minimal approach to agency can scale up in studying interactive agential dynamics in more complex systems. The examples of coordination dynamics (Kelso, 2001) and participatory sense-making (De Jaegher & Di Paolo, 2007) are provided to show how understanding agency requires us to look beyond the individuals to the interactive agential dynamics that can guide, scaffold, or constrain their activity.
Funder
The University of Adelaide
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference74 articles.
1. Alderisio, F., Fiore, G., Salesse, R. N., Bardy, B. G., & Bernardo, M. (2017). Interaction patterns and individual dynamics shape the way we move in synchrony. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 6846. 2. Auvray, M., Lenay, C., & Stewart, J. (2006). The attribution of intentionality in a simulated environment: The case of minimalist devices. Tenth meeting of the association for the scientific study of consciousness, Oxford, UK, 23–26 June, 2006. 3. Balasubramaniam, L., Doostmohammadi, A., Saw, T. B., Narayana, G. H. N. S., Mueller, R., Dang, T., & Thomas, M. (2021). Investigating the nature of active forces in tissues reveals how contractile cells can form extensile monolayers. Nature Materials, 20, 1156–1166.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-021-00919-2. 4. Barandiaran, X. E., Di Paolo, E., & Rohde, M. (2009). Defining agency: Individuality, normativity, asymmetry, and spatio-temporality in action. Adaptive Behavior, 17(5), 367–386. 5. Barberis, L., & Peruani, F. (2016). Large-scale patterns in a minimal cognitive flocking model: Incidental leaders, nematic patterns, and aggregates. Physical Review Letters, 117 No(24), 248001.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|