Abstract
AbstractIn this paper I argue that many scholars involved in the contemporary free will debates have underappreciated the philosophical appeal of agent causation because the resources of contemporary emergentism have not been adequately introduced into the discussion. Whereas I agree that agent causation’s main problem has to do with its intelligibility, particularly with respect to the issue of how substances can be causally relevant, I argue that the notion of substance causation can be clearly articulated from an emergentist framework. According to my proposal, a free agent isa causally powerful substance that emerges in an anomic way from her constitutive mental events, downwardly constraining, selecting and, in this way, having control on them. As we shall see, this particular concept of agent causation not only makes sense of the deep insight behind agent libertarianism, but it also provides us with the resources to solve some of the main objections that have been raised against it. It is true that here I cannot develop a complete defense of the evidential credentials of emergentism. Still, even if the considerations that follow do not serve to convince detractors of agent causal libertarian accounts of free will, they do suggest that libertarian agent causation is more promising than is typically acknowledged.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference100 articles.
1. Alexander, S. (1920). Space, Time, and deity (2 vol.). Macmillan.
2. Anderson, P. W. (1972). More is different. Science, 177(4047), 393–396.
3. Armstrong, D. M. (1997). A World of States of Affairs. Cambridge University Press.
4. Balaguer, M. (2009). Free Will as an Open Scientific Problem. MIT Press.
5. Barnes, E. (2012). Emergence and fundamentality. Mind, 121(184), 873–901.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Thing causation;Noûs;2024-03-20