Abstract
AbstractThis paper investigates how intuitions about scientific discovery using artificial intelligence (AI) can be used to improve our understanding of scientific discovery more generally. Traditional accounts of discovery have been agent-centred: they place emphasis on identifying a specific agent who is responsible for conducting all, or at least the important part, of a discovery process. We argue that these accounts experience difficulties capturing scientific discovery involving AI and that similar issues arise for human discovery. We propose an alternative, collective-centred view as superior for understanding discovery, with and without AI. This view maintains that discovery is performed by a collective of agents and entities, each making contributions that differ in significance and character, and that attributing credit for discovery depends on various finer-grained properties of the contributions made. Detailing its conceptual resources, we argue that this view is considerably more compelling than its agent-centred alternative. Considering and responding to several theoretical and practical challenges, we point to concrete avenues for further developing the view we propose.
Funder
Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference77 articles.
1. Ardanuy, M., McDonough K., Krause, A., Wilson, D. C. S., Hosseini, K., & van Strien, D. (2019). Resolving places, past and present: Toponym resolution in historical British newspapers using multiple resources. In Proceedings of the 13th workshop on geographic information retrieval (GIR ’19). Article 3, 1–6. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3371140.3371143
2. Banerjee, A., & Monteleoni, C. (2014). Climate change: Challenges for machine learning. NIPS tutorial. Retrieved June 21, 2021, from https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/video/tutorial-climate-change-challenges-for-machine-learning/
3. Bannigan, P., Aldeghi, M., Bao, Z., Häse, F., Aspuru-Guzik, A., & Allen, C. (2021). Machine learning directed drug formulation development. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 175, 113–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2021.05.016
4. Barwich, A. (2021). Fishing for genes: How the largest gene family in the mammalian genome was found (and why idiosyncrasy in exploration matters). Perspectives on Science, 29(4), 359–387. https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00375
5. Best, M., & Neuhauser, D. (2004). Semmelweis and the birth of infection control. BMJ Quality & Safety, 13, 233–234. https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.13.3.233
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献