Abstract
AbstractA characterization of epistemic rationality, or epistemic justification, is typically taken to require a process of conceptual clarification, and is seen as comprising the core of a theory of (epistemic) rationality. I propose to explicate the concept of rationality. It is essential, I argue, that the normativity of rationality, and the purpose, or goal, for which the particular theory of rationality is being proposed, is taken into account when explicating the concept of rationality. My position thus amounts to an instrumentalist position about theories of epistemic rationality. Since there are different purposes, or goals, for which theories of rationality are proposed, the method of explication leaves room for different characterizations of rationality. I focus on two such (kinds of) purposes: first, the purpose of guiding the formation (or maintenance) of doxastic states and, second, the purpose of assessing (the formation or maintenance of) doxastic states. I conclude by outlining a pluralistic picture concerning rationality.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference63 articles.
1. Alston, W. (1986). Internalism and externalism in epistemology. Philosophical Topics, 14, 179–221.
2. Alston, W. (1993). Epistemic desiderata. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 53, 527–551.
3. Beaney, M. (2018). Analysis. In: E.N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/analysis/.
4. Boniolo, G. (2003). Kant’s explication and Carnap’s explication: The redde rationem. International Philosophical Quarterly, 43, 289–298.
5. BonJour, L. (1985). The structure of empirical knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献