Abstract
AbstractThis paper outlines a new method for identifying folk intuitions to complement armchair intuiting and experimental philosophy (X-Phi), and thereby enrich the philosopher’s toolkit. This new approach—trope analysis—depends not on what people report their intuitions to be but rather on what they have made and engaged with; I propose that tropes in fiction (‘you can’t change the past’, ‘a foreknown future isn’t free’ and so forth) reveal which theories, concepts and ideas we find intuitive, repeatedly and en masse. Imagination plays a dual role in both existing methods and this new approach: it enables us to create the scenarios that elicit our intuitions, and also to mentally represent them. The method I propose allows us to leverage the imagination of the many rather than the few on both counts—scenarios are both created and consumed by the folk themselves.
Funder
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference49 articles.
1. Augustine. (2006). City of God. In H. Bettenson, & G. R. Evans (trans.), London: Penguin Classics.
2. Bealer, G. (1998). Intuitions and the autonomy of philosophy. In M. DePaul & W. Ramsey (Eds.), Rethinking intuition: The psychology of intuition and its role in philosophical inquiry (pp. 201–239). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
3. Bluhm, R. (2016). Corpus analysis in philosophy. In M. Hinton (Ed.), Evidence, experiment and argument in linguistics and the philosophy of language (pp. 91–109). Bern: Peter Lang.
4. Boethius (2008) The consolation of philosophy. In D. R. Slavitt (trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Bokyo, E. J. (2013). Observational research—Opportunities and limitations. Journal of Diabetes and its Complications, 27(6), 642–648.