1. Achinstein, P. (1998). Why philosophical theories of evidence Are (and Ought to Be) ignored by scientists. Philosophy of Science, 67 (Proceedings), S180–S192.
2. Achinstein, P. (2008). Mills’ sins. In D. Mayo & A. Spanos (Eds.), Error and inference: Recent exchanges on the philosophy of science, inductive-statistical inference, and reliable evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (forthcoming).
3. Bartz-Beilestein, T. (2008). How experimental algorthmics can benefits from Mayo’s extensions to Neymoan-Pearson theory of testing (this volume).
4. Chalmers A. (1999). What is this thing called science? (3rd ed). Indianapolis/Cambridge, Hackett Publishing Company, Inc
5. Chalmers, A. (2008). In D. Mayo, & A. Spanos (Eds.), Error and inference: Recent exchanges on the philosophy of science, inductive-statistical inference, and reliable evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (forthcoming).