Abstract
AbstractA common adage runs that, given a theory manifesting symmetries, the syntax of that theory should be modified in order to construct a new theory, from which symmetry-variant structure of the original theory has been excised. Call this strategy for explicating the underlying ontology of symmetry-related models reduction. Recently, Dewar has proposed an alternative to reduction as a means of articulating the ontology of symmetry-related models—what he calls (external) sophistication, in which the semantics of the original theory is modified, and symmetry-related models of that theory are treated as if they are isomorphic. In this paper, we undertake a critical evaluation of sophistication about symmetries—we find the programme underdeveloped in a number of regards. In addition, we clarify the interplay between sophistication about symmetries, and a separate debate to which Dewar has contributed—viz., that between interpretational versus motivational approaches to symmetry transformations.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference64 articles.
1. Aharonov, Y., & Bohm, D. (1959). Significance of electromagnetic potentials in quantum theory. Physical Review, 115, 485–491.
2. Anderson, J. L. (1967). Principles of relativity physics. New York and London: Academic Press.
3. Armstrong, D. (1988). Are quantities relations? A reply to bigelow and pargetter. Philosophical Studies, 54, 305–316.
4. Belot, G. (2003). Symmetry and gauge freedom. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 34, 189–225.
5. Belot, G. (2013). Symmetry and equivalence. In R. Batterman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of physics (pp. 318–339). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献