Abstract
AbstractWe present a multiscale integrationist interpretation of the boundaries of cognitive systems, using the Markov blanket formalism of the variational free energy principle. This interpretation is intended as a corrective for the philosophical debate over internalist and externalist interpretations of cognitive boundaries; we stake out a compromise position. We first survey key principles of new radical (extended, enactive, embodied) views of cognition. We then describe an internalist interpretation premised on the Markov blanket formalism. Having reviewed these accounts, we develop our positive multiscale account. We argue that the statistical seclusion of internal from external states of the system—entailed by the existence of a Markov boundary—can coexist happily with the multiscale integration of the system through its dynamics. Our approach does not privilege any given boundary (whether it be that of the brain, body, or world), nor does it argue that all boundaries are equally prescient. We argue that the relevant boundaries of cognition depend on the level being characterised and the explanatory interests that guide investigation. We approach the issue of how and where to draw the boundaries of cognitive systems through a multiscale ontology of cognitive systems, which offers a multidisciplinary research heuristic for cognitive science.
Funder
Wellcome Trust
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Australian Research Council
Canada First Research Excellence Fund
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference88 articles.
1. Allen, M. (2018). The foundation: Mechanism, prediction, and falsification in Bayesian enactivism. Comment on “Answering Schrödinger’s question: A free-energy formulation” by Maxwell James Désormeau Ramstead et al. Physics of Life Reviews, 24, 17–20.
2. Allen, M., & Friston, K. J. (2018). From cognitivism to autopoiesis: Towards a computational framework for the embodied mind. Synthese, 195(6), 2459–2482.
3. Anderson, M. (2017). Of Bayes and bullets: An embodied, situated, targeting-based account of predictive processing. In T. Metzinger & W. Wiese (Eds.), Philosophy and Predictive Processing. Frankfurt am Main: MIND Group.
4. Badcock, P., Friston, K., & Ramstead, M. (2019). The hierarchically mechanistic mind: A free-energy formulation of the human psyche. Physics of Life Reviews, 1–18.
5. Bruineberg, J., Kiverstein, J., & Rietveld, E. (2016). The anticipating brain is not a scientist: The free-energy principle from an ecological-enactive perspective. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1239-1.
Cited by
89 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献