Is the maximum entropy production just a heuristic principle? Metaphysics on natural determination
Author:
Sánchez-Cañizares JavierORCID
Abstract
AbstractThe Maximum Entropy Production Principle (MEPP) stands out as an overarching principle that rules life phenomena in Nature. However, its explanatory power beyond heuristics remains controversial. On the one hand, the MEPP has been successfully applied principally to non-living systems far from thermodynamic equilibrium. On the other hand, the underlying assumptions to lay the MEPP’s theoretical foundations and range of applicability increase the possibilities of conflicting interpretations. More interestingly, from a metaphysical stance, the MEPP’s philosophical status is hotly debated: does the MEPP passively translate physical information into macroscopic predictions or actively select the physical solution in multistable systems, granting the connection between scientific models and reality? This paper deals directly with this dilemma by discussing natural determination from three angles: (1) Heuristics help natural philosophers to build an ontology. (2) The MEPP’s ontological status may stem from its selection of new forms of causation beyond physicalism. (3) The MEPP’s ontology ultimately depends on the much-discussed question of the ontology of probabilities in an information-theoretic approach and the ontology of macrostates according to the Boltzmannian definition of entropy.
Funder
Institute for Culture and Society Universidad de Navarra
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference63 articles.
1. Albantakis, L., Barbosa, L., Findlay, G., Grasso, M., Haun, A. M., Marshall, W., et al. (2022). Integrated information theory (IIT) 4.0: Formulating the properties of phenomenal existence in physical terms, 1–53. http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.14787 2. Albantakis, L., Hintze, A., Koch, C., Adami, C., & Tononi, G. (2014). Evolution of integrated causal structures in animats axposed to environments of increasing complexity. PLoS Computational Biology, 10(12), e1003966. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003966 3. Balduzzi, D., & Tononi, G. (2008). Integrated information in discrete dynamical systems: Motivation and theoretical framework. PLoS Computational Biology, 4(6), e1000091. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000091 4. Barrett, N. F., & Sánchez-Cañizares, J. (2018). Causation as the Self-determination of a Singular and Freely Chosen Optimality. The Review of Metaphysics, 71(4), 755–787. 5. Bruineberg, J., Dołęga, K., Dewhurst, J., & Baltieri, M. (2022). The emperor’s new markov blankets. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 45, e183. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X21002351
|
|