Abstract
AbstractThe theory of collective agency and intentionality is a flourishing field of research, and our understanding of these phenomena has arguably increased greatly in recent years. Extant theories, however, are still ill-equipped to explain certain aspects of collective intentionality. In this article we draw attention to two such underappreciated (and intertwined) aspects: the failure of the intentional states of collectives to supervene on the intentional states of their members, and the role of non-human factors in collective agency and intentionality (‘hybrid’ collective intentionality). We propose a theory of collective intentionality which builds on the ‘interpretationist’ tradition in metasemantics and the philosophy of mind as initiated by David Lewis and recently developed further by Robbie Williams. The collective-level analogue of interpretationism turns out to look different in some ways from the individual-level theory, but is well-suited to accommodating phenomena such as hybrid collective intentionality. Complemented with Kit Fine’s theory of variable embodiment, such a theory also provides a diachronic account of intentional collectives.
Funder
H2020 European Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference36 articles.
1. Arrow, K. (1951). Social choice and individual values. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2. Bratman, M. E. (1999). Faces of intention: Selected essays on intention and agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Dietrich, F., & List, C. (2010). The aggregation of propositional attitudes: Towards a general theory. Oxford Studies in Epistemology, 3(215), 34.
4. Epstein, B. (2015). The ant trap: Rebuilding the foundations of the social sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Epstein, B. (2016). A framework for social ontology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 46(2), 147–167.
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. A human-centred approach to symbiotic AI: Questioning the ethical and conceptual foundation;Intelligenza Artificiale;2024-07-31
2. Concluding Remarks: Organized Groups as Agents;Groups as Epistemic and Moral Agents;2024-06-27
3. Group Excuse from Blameless Ignorance;Groups as Epistemic and Moral Agents;2024-06-27
4. Group Action for a Reason;Groups as Epistemic and Moral Agents;2024-06-27
5. Group Justified Belief and Knowledge;Groups as Epistemic and Moral Agents;2024-06-27