Author:
Galeazzi Paolo,Lorini Emiliano
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference32 articles.
1. Aumann, R. (1995). Interactive epistemology, Discussion Paper No. 67. Center for Rationality and Interactive Decision Theory. The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
2. Aumann, R., & Brandenburger, A. (1995). Epistemic conditions for nash equilibrium. Econometrica, 63, 1161–1180.
3. Balbiani, P., Herzig, A., & Troquard, N. (2008). Alternative axiomatics and complexity of deliberative stit theories. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 37(4), 387–406.
4. Baltag, A., & Smets, S. (2008). A qualitative theory of dynamic interactive belief revision. Texts in Logic and Games, 3, 9–58.
5. Baltag, A., Smets, S., & Zvesper, J. (2009). Keep ‘Hoping’ for rationality: A solution to the backward induction paradox. Synthese, 169, 301–333.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Interpersonal independence of knowledge and belief;Synthese;2024-07-03
2. A Doxastic Characterisation of Autonomous Decisive Systems;Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science;2022-09-27
3. Checking Agent Intentions in Games;2021 IEEE 33rd International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI);2021-11
4. Quantified Temporal Alethic Boulesic Doxastic Logic;Logica Universalis;2020-11-06
5. Fuzzy Neighborhood Semantics for Multi-agent Probabilistic Reasoning in Games;Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems;2020