Abstract
AbstractAn important part of research is situating one’s work in a body of existing literature, thereby connecting to existing ideas. Despite this, the various kinds of relationships that might exist among academic literature do not appear to have been formally studied. Here I present a graphical representation of academic work in terms of entities and relations, drawing on structure-mapping theory (used in the study of analogies). I then use this representation to present a typology of operations that could relate two pieces of academic work. I illustrate the various types of relationships with examples from medicine, physics, psychology, history and philosophy of science, machine learning, education, and neuroscience. The resulting typology not only gives insights into the relationships that might exist between static publications, but also the rich process whereby an ongoing research project evolves through interactions with the research literature.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference58 articles.
1. Adleman, L. M. (1994). Molecular computation of solutions to combinatorial problems. Science, 266(5187), 1021–1024. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7973651
2. Aswathy, M., & Jagannath, M. (2021). An SVM approach towards breast cancer classification from H &E-stained histopathology images based on integrated features. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 59(9), 1773–1783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-021-02403-0
3. Bach, N., & Badaskar, S. (2007). A review of relation extraction. Literature Review for Language and Statistics II, 2, 1–15. https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~nbach/papers/A-survey-on-Relation-Extraction.pdf
4. Bhagavatula, C., Feldman, S., Power, R., & Ammar, W. (2018, June). Content-based citation recommendation. In M. Walker, H. Ji, & A. Stent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) (pp. 238–251). ACL.
5. Brachman, R. J. (1983). What IS-A is and isn’t: An analysis of taxonomic links in semantic networks. Computer, 16(10), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.1983.1654194