Abstract
AbstractThe aim of this paper is to show that scientific thought experiments and works of science fiction are highly suitable tools for facilitating and increasing understanding of science. After comparing one of Einstein’s most famous thought experiments with the science fiction novel “The Forever War”, I shall argue that both proceed similarly in making some of the more outlandish consequences of special relativity theory intelligible. However, as I will also point out, understanding in thought experiments and understanding in science fiction differ in one important respect: While the former aim at what I shall call “physical understanding”, science fiction novels typically have “existential understanding” as their target.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference53 articles.
1. Brown, J. R. (2014). Explaining, seeing, and understanding in thought experiments. Perspectives on Science, 22(3), 357–376.
2. Brown, J. R., & Fehige, Y. (2017). Thought experiments. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Summer 2017. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/thought-experiment/. Accessed 13 July 2019.
3. Carroll, N. (2002). The wheel of virtue: Art, literature, and moral knowledge. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 60(1), 3–26.
4. Chang, H. (2009). Ontological principles and the intelligibility of epistemic activities. In H. De Regt, S. Leonelli, & K. Eigner (Eds.), Scientific understanding: Philosophical perspectives (pp. 64–82). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
5. Chang, H. (2011). The philosophical grammar of scientific practice. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 25(3), 205–221.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献