On the meaning of EPR’s Reality Criterion

Author:

Gömöri MártonORCID,Hofer-Szabó Gábor

Abstract

AbstractThis essay has two main claims about EPR’s Reality Criterion. First, we claim that the application of the Reality Criterion makes an essential difference between the EPR argument and Einstein’s later arguments against quantum mechanics. We show that while the EPR argument, making use of the Reality Criterion, does derive that certain interpretations of quantum mechanics are incomplete, Einstein’s later arguments, making no use of the Reality Criterion, do not prove incompleteness, but rather point to the inadequacy of the Copenhagen interpretation. We take this fact as an indication that the Reality Criterion is a crucial, indispensable component of the incompleteness argument(s). The second claim is more substantive. We argue that the Reality Criterion is a special case of the Common Cause Principle. Finally, we relate this proposal to Tim Maudlin’s recent assertion that the Reality Criterion is an analytic truth.

Funder

Eötvös Loránd University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Social Sciences,Philosophy

Reference38 articles.

1. Bell, J. S. (1964). On the Einsten–Podolsky–Rosen paradox. Physics 1, 195–200 (1964). Reprinted in: J. S. Bell, Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).

2. Cavalcanti, G., & Lal, R. (2014). On modifications of Reichenbach‘s principle of common cause in light of Bell‘s theorem. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 47, 424010.

3. Einstein, A. (1936). Physik und Realität. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 221, 313-347 (1936). Translated as Physics and Reality. in Ideas and opinions, 290–323 (New York: Crown Publishing Co., 1954).

4. Einstein, A. (1948). Autobiographical Notes. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), Albert Einstein, Philosopher–Scientist. La Salle, Illinois: Open Court.

5. Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935). Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical Review, 47, 777–780.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Classicality and Bell’s theorem;European Journal for Philosophy of Science;2023-09

2. Einstein Completeness as Categoricity;Foundations of Physics;2023-03-18

3. The Positive Argument Against Scientific Realism;Journal for General Philosophy of Science;2023-03-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3