Demystifying the myth of sensation: Wilfrid Sellars’ adverbialism reconsidered

Author:

Corti LucaORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis paper reconstructs and defends a Sellarsian approach to “sensation” that allows us to avoid mythological conceptions of it. Part I reconstructs and isolates Sellars’s argument for “sensation,” situating his adverbial interpretation of the notion within his broader theory of perception. Part II positions Sellars’s views vis-à-vis current conversations on adverbalism. In particular, it focuses on the Many Property Problem, which is traditionally considered the main obstacle to adverbialism. After reconstructing Sellars’s response to this problem, I demonstrate that his position is compatible with some current strategies to solving it and can be developed along similar lines. Finally, part III addresses how a Sellarsian adverbial approach productively accounts for the phenomenal properties of experience often understood to fall under the notion of “sensation”. The paper therefore shows how isolating Sellars’s argument can yield a non-problematic conception of sensation. Indeed, the argument on which I focus offers a form of direct realism compatible with recent forms of “new adverbialism”. Although my view remains Sellarsian, to defend it I maintain that some Sellarsian claims about sensation should be resisted as not logically entailed by his argument.

Funder

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Social Sciences,Philosophy

Reference66 articles.

1. Banick, K. (2018). How to be an adverbialist about phenomenal intentionality. Synthese, 198(21), 661–686.

2. Barth, K. (2018). Sellars on Descartes. In L. Corti & A. M. Nunziante (Eds.), Sellars and the history of modern philosophy. Routledge.

3. Brewer, B. (2011). Perception and its objects. Oxford University Press.

4. Brewer, B. (2017). The object view of perception. Topoi, 36, 215–227.

5. Butchvarov, P. (1980). Adverbial theories of consciousness. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 5(3), 261–280.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Observing Mythical Entities;Grazer Philosophische Studien;2023-12-14

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3