Abstract
AbstractIt is widely thought that deepfake videos are a significant and unprecedented threat to our epistemic practices. In some writing about deepfakes, manipulated videos appear as the harbingers of an unprecedented epistemic apocalypse. In this paper I want to take a critical look at some of the more catastrophic predictions about deepfake videos. I will argue for three claims: (1) that once we recognise the role of social norms in the epistemology of recordings, deepfakes are much less concerning, (2) that the history of photographic manipulation reveals some important precedents, correcting claims about the novelty of deepfakes, and (3) that proposed solutions to deepfakes have been overly focused on technological interventions. My overall goal is not so much to argue that deepfakes are not a problem, but to argue that behind concerns around deepfakes lie a more general class of social problems about the organisation of our epistemic practices.
Funder
HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference85 articles.
1. Abrams, L. (2022). Elon Musk deep fakes promote new BitVex cryptocurrency scam, Bleeping Computer, May 22nd 2022. https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/elon-musk-deep-fakes-promote-new-bitvex-cryptocurrency-scam/
2. Atencia-Linares, P. (2012). Fiction, nonfiction, and deceptive photographic representation. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 70(1), 19–30.
3. Ball, J. (2017). Post-truth: How bullshit conquered the world. Biteback Publishing.
4. Beegan, G. (2008). The mass image: A social history of photomechanical reproduction in victorian London. Palgrave Macmillan.
5. Benjamin, W. (1931/1999). Little history of photography. Selected writings, 2(Part 2), 1931–1934.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献