Negative expertise in conditions of manufactured ignorance: epistemic strategies, virtues and skills

Author:

Parviainen JaanaORCID,Lahikainen Lauri

Abstract

AbstractThis paper is motivated by the need to respond to the spread of influential misinformation and manufactured ignorance, which places pressure on the work of experts in various sectors. To meet this need, the paper discusses the conditions required for expert testimony to evolve a reconceptualisation of negative capability as a new form of epistemic humility. In this regard, professional knowledge formation is not considered to be separate from the institutional and social processes and values that uphold its production. Drawing attention to the structural and relational aspects of ignorance, as opposed to the individualistic and internal aspects, we rely on the sociology of knowledge, the social epistemologies and the feminist epistemologies that have played a fundamental role in the development of the investigation of ignorance. First, we analyse the criteria for epistemic humility based on prior theoretical discussions concerning negative knowledge as a form of reflective practice. Then, we seek to determine what kinds of strategies, virtues and skills experts need to have so as to ‘manage ignorance’ in socially complex situations. Finally, we suggest the reformulation of negative expertise as a phronetic skill for navigating through situations of ignorance and uncertainty in an epistemically and socially responsible manner.

Funder

Academy of Finland

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Social Sciences,Philosophy

Reference77 articles.

1. Adlam, J. (2014). Going spiral? Phenomena of ‘half-knowledge’ in the experiential large group as temporary learning community. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 22(1), 157–168.

2. Alcoff, L. (2007). Epistemologies of ignorance: Three types. In S. Sullivan & N. Tuana (Eds.), Race and epistemologies of ignorance (pp. 39–57). Albany: State University of New York Press.

3. Alcoff, L., & Potter, E. (Eds.). (1993). Feminist epistemologies. New York: Routledge.

4. Anderson, E. (2011). Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2012 Edition). Retrieved on January 30, 2019 https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2012/entries/feminism-epistemology/.

5. Ariso, J. M. (Ed.). (2017). Augmented reality. Reflections on its contribution to knowledge formation. Berlin: De Gruyter.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3