Abstract
AbstractThe current conception of the plurality of worlds is founded on a set theoretic understanding of possibilia. This paper provides an alternative category theoretic conception and argues that it is at least as serviceable for our understanding of possibilia. In addition to or instead of the notion of possibilia conceived as possible objects or possible individuals, this alternative to set theoretic modal realism requires the notion of possible morphisms, conceived as possible changes, processes or transformations. To support this alternative conception of the plurality of worlds, I provide two examples where a category theoretic account can do work traditionally done by the set theoretic account: one on modal logic and another on paradoxes of size. I argue that the categorial account works at least as well as the set theoretic account, and moreover suggest that it has something to add in each case: it makes apparent avenues of inquiry that were obscured, if not invisible, on the set theoretic account. I conclude with a plea for epistemological humility about our acceptance of either a category-like or set-like realist ontology of modality.
Funder
Cambridge Commonwealth, European and International Trust
Leverhulme Trust
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference60 articles.
1. Adámek, J., Herrlich, H., & Strecker, G. E. (2004). Abstract and concrete categories. In The joy of cats. A Wiley-Interscience publication Volume 6 of Pure and Applied Mathematics: A Wiley Series of Texts, Monographs and Tracts Pure and applied mathematics.
2. Alechina, N., Mendler, M., De Paiva, V., & Ritter, E. (2001). Categorical and Kripke semantics for constructive S4 modal logic. In International workshop on computer science logic (pp. 292–307). Springer.
3. Areces, C., & ten Cate, B. (2007). Hybrid logics. Handbook of Modal Logic, 3, 821–868.
4. Areces, C., Blackburn, P., & Marx, M. (1999). A road-map on complexity for hybrid logics. In International workshop on computer science logic (pp. 307–321). Springer.
5. Artin, M., Grothendieck, A., & Verdier, J. L. (1973). Théorie des topos et cohomologie etale des schémas: Tome 3. Springer.