Abstract
AbstractI suggest that the current situation in quantum field theory (QFT) provides some reason to question the universal validity of ontological reductionism. I argue that the renormalization group flow is reversible except at fixed points, which makes the relation between large and small distance scales quite symmetric in QFT, opening up at least the technical possibility of a non-reductionist approach to QFT. I suggest that some conceptual problems encountered within QFT may potentially be mitigated by moving to an alternative picture in which it is no longer the case that the large supervenes on the small. Finally, I explore some specific models in which a form of non-reductionism might be implemented, and consider the prospects for future development of these models.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference57 articles.
1. Aharonov, Y., Albert, D. Z., & Vaidman, L. (1988). How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin-1/2 particle can turn out to be 100. Physical Review Letters, 60, 1351–1354. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.1351
2. Batterman, R. W. (2023). Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 97, 130–132. ISSN 0039-3681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2022.08.017
3. Berestetskii, V. B., Pitaevskii, L. P., & Lifshitz, E. M. (2012). Quantum electrodynamics (Vol. 4). Elsevier Science. ISBN 9780080503462. https://books.google.com/books?id=Tpk-lqyr3GoC
4. Berryman, S. (2023). Democritus. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Spring 2023 edition. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
5. Bethke, S. (2007). Experimental tests of asymptotic freedom. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, 58(2), 351–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2006.06.001