On the indispensability of theoretical terms and entities

Author:

Johannesson EricORCID

Abstract

AbstractSome realists claim that theoretical entities like numbers and electrons are indispensable for describing the empirical world. Motivated by the meta-ontology of Quine, I take this claim to imply that, for some first-order theory T and formula $$\delta (x)$$ δ ( x ) such that $$T \vdash \exists x \delta \wedge \exists x \lnot \delta $$ T x δ x ¬ δ , where $$\delta (x)$$ δ ( x ) is intended to apply to all and only empirical entities, there is no first-order theory $$T'$$ T such that (a) T and $$T'$$ T describe the $$\delta $$ δ :s in the same way, (b) $$T' \vdash \forall x \delta $$ T x δ , and (c) $$T'$$ T is at least as attractive as T in terms of other theoretical virtues. In an attempt to refute the realist claim, I try to solve the general problem of nominalizingT (with respect to $$\delta $$ δ ), namely to find a theory $$T'$$ T satisfying conditions (a)–(c) under various precisifications thereof. In particular, I note that condition (a) can be understood either in terms of syntactic or semantic equivalence, where the latter is strictly stronger than the former. The results are somewhat mixed. On the positive side, even under the stronger precisification of (a), I establish that (1) if the vocabulary of T is finite, a nominalizing theory can always be found that is recursive if T is, and (2) if T postulates infinitely many $$\delta $$ δ :s, a nominalizing theory can always be found that is no more computationally complex than T. On the negative side, even under the weaker precisification of (a), I establish that (3) certain finite theories cannot be nominalized by a finite theory.

Funder

Stockholm University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Social Sciences,Philosophy

Reference19 articles.

1. Burgess, J. P., & Rosen, G. (1999). A subject with no object. Oxford University Press.

2. Colyvan, M. (2019). Indispensability arguments in the philosophy of mathematics. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, spring 2019 edition.

3. Craig, W. (1953). On axiomatizability within a system. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 18(1), 30–32.

4. Craig, W., & Vaught, R. L. (1958). Finite axiomatizability using additional predicates. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 23(3), 289–308.

5. Field, H. (1980). Science without numbers. Princeton University Press.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Quine’s Underdetermination Thesis;Erkenntnis;2022-08-26

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3