Abstract
AbstractI present an argument for causal fundamentality, understood as the thesis that the causal history of every being, whose existence has a causal explanation, includes some uncaused beings. I argue that this thesis is a consequence of an actualist account of metaphysical modality whose novelty lies in its hybrid dispositional-essentialist foundation. I argue that my modal theory is extensionally correct and minimalistic. Its range of metaphysical necessities and possibilities is just as wide as needed to capture the pre-theoretical notion of modality. Moreover, my theory is immune from the necessitism of standard essentialist accounts of modality and addresses the challenge of global possibilities facing dispositionalist modal theories thanks to its essentialist component.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference21 articles.
1. Aquinas, T. (2006). Summa Theologica, Part I (Prima Pars) From the Complete American Edition. Project Gutenberg. http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/17611
2. Bliss, R. (2019). What work the fundamental? Erkenntnis, 84(2), 359–379.
3. Borghini, A., & Williams, N. E. (2008). A dispositional theory of possibility. Dialectica, 62(1), 21–41.
4. Fine, K. (1994). Essence and modality. Philosophical Perspective, 8, 1–16.
5. Fine, K. (2001). The question of realism. Philosophers’ Imprint, 1, 1–30.