Kinetic Values, Mobility (in)equalities, and Ageing in Smart Urban Environments

Author:

Parviainen JaanaORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe idea of the right to mobility has been fundamental to modern Western citizenship and is expressed in many legal and government documents. Although there is widespread acceptance regarding the importance of mobility in older adults, there have been few attempts to develop ethical and theoretical tools to portray mobility (in)equalities in old age. This paper develops a novel conceptualisation of kinetic values focusing on older adults whose ability to move has been restricted for internal and external reasons. Informed by the phenomenological theory of kinaesthesia, I suggest that kinetic values are related to four principal dimensions: self-motion, being-moved, co-motion, and forced movement. I assume that these dimensions can address the key dilemma of human dignity among older adults who suffer from losing their autonomy and agency through their mobility impairments and who are at risk of being confined to their homes. To concretise the formulation of kinetic values, I study movement as part of technological equipment and urban infrastructure to examine what kinds of kinetic values mobility services and assistive robots convey for older adults in smart urban environments. By bridging disciplines, the phenomenological approach provides a novel understanding of mobility and the interplay among assistive technologies, kinaesthesia, and urban technological infrastructure. The approach suggests that kinetic values should be interpreted more comprehensively so that kinaesthesia can become better identified as a positive life-promoting practice.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Philosophy

Reference58 articles.

1. Abdul Khaiyom JH (2020) Managing mental health in pandemic COVID-19 and movement control order. Malays J Med Sci 27(4):147–153. https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms2020.27.4.14

2. Aristotle (2014) Metaphysics. Complete Works of Aristotle, Volume 2: The Revised Oxford Translation. Princeton University Press, Princeton

3. Bedaf S, Gelderblom GJ, De Witte L (2015) Overview and categorization of robots supporting independent living of elderly people: What activities do they support and how far have they developed. Assist Technol 27(2):88–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2014.978916

4. Blomley N (1994) Mobility, empowerment and the rights revolution. Political Geogr 13:407–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/0962-6298(94)90048-5

5. Bock T, Linner T, Ikeda W (2012) Exoskeleton and humanoid robotic technology in construction and built environment. In: Zaier R (ed) The future of humanoid robots – Research and applications. INTECH Open Access Publisher, Rijeka, pp 111–146

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3